Preview

South Russian Journal of Cancer

Advanced search

Multivisceral resection for ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis following induction bidirectional chemotherapy using pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy

https://doi.org/10.37748/2686-9039-2026-7-2-7

EDN: YWLTZE

Abstract

Peritoneal carcinomatosis in advanced ovarian cancer is an unfavorable prognostic factor and limits the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy. This provides a rationale for the use of locoregional treatment modalities, including pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Of particular interest is the safety of a bidirectional strategy (systemic chemotherapy + PIPAC) in patients requiring multivisceral resection.

We present a clinical case of a patient with advanced ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Induction bidirectional chemotherapy was administered, consisting of paclitaxel/carboplatin (6 cycles) combined with PIPAC using cisplatin 30 mg/m² (50 mg), 30-minute exposure, 3 sessions, followed by multivisceral cytoreductive surgery. Efficacy was assessed based on tumor marker dynamics, peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and morphological response (TRG), while safety was evaluated according to perioperative complications and the feasibility of continuing PIPAC after surgery.

At initial laparoscopy in April 2025, peritoneal carcinomatosis was detected (PCI 26); the first PIPAC session was performed, followed by systemic chemotherapy. After the second cycle, a partial response was documented. In June 2025, multivisceral cytoreductive surgery was performed, including anterior resection of the rectum with sigmoid stoma formation. Systemic therapy was resumed early and completed up to 6 cycles. By 20.08.2025, tumor markers had decreased: CA-125 to 47 U/mL, CA 19–9 to 13.7 U/mL, and HE-4 to 120 U/mL. Before PIPAC-2 (September 2025), no macroscopic carcinomato sis was detected (PCI 0); no tumor cells were found in peritoneal biopsy specimens, corresponding to TRG 1. At PIPAC-3 (November 2025), PCI remained 0, and repeat biopsies also corresponded to TRG 1.

Induction bidirectional chemotherapy including PIPAC in a patient with advanced ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis demonstrated clinical feasibility, safety and marked antitumor efficacy even after multivisceral cytoreduction.

About the Authors

A. S. Dzasokhov
https://gbuzmood.ru
Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary

Balashikha, Russian Federation

 

Aleksey S. Dzasokhov – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Head of the Oncogynecology Department, Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary, Balashikha, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-3533, eLibrary SPIN: 9396-9145, AuthorID: 687196, Scopus Author ID: 57991081900


Competing Interests:

Author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.



E. Yu. Stolbova
https://gbuzmood.ru
Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary

Balashikha, Russian Federation

 

Elena Yu. Stolbova – oncologist, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary, Balashikha, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7122-624X


Competing Interests:

Author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.



A. V. Turiev
https://gbuzmood.ru
Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary

Balashikha, Russian Federation

 

Artur V. Turiev – MD, Oncologist of Oncogynecological Department, Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary, Balashikha, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-4873, eLibrary AuthorID: 610061, Scopus Author ID: 59184474800


Competing Interests:

Author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.



V. L. Astashov
https://gbuzmood.ru
Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary

Balashikha, Russian Federation

 

Vladimir L. Astashov – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Chief Physician, Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary, Balashikha, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1075-3797, eLibrary SPIN: 2917-3217, AuthorID: 1084592, Scopus Author ID: 6508241054


Competing Interests:

Author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.



S. O. Gunyakov
https://fmbafmbc.ru
State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation – A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Sergey O. Gunyakov – 2nd-year resident physician in pediatric oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation – A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4796-8249, eLibrary SPIN: 6585-3210, AuthorID: 1284212


Competing Interests:

Author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.



M. G. Makeeva
https://rgsu.net
Russian State Social University

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Milena G. Makeeva – 4th-year medical student, specialty “General Medicine”, Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5691-936X


Competing Interests:

Author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.



K. B. Ischenko
https://gbuzmood.ru
Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary

Balashikha, Russian Federation

 

Ksenia B. Ischenko – Head of Pathology Department, State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation – A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7667-3306


Competing Interests:

Author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.



References

1. González-Martín A, Harter P, Leary A, Lorusso D, Miller RE, Pothuri B, et al.; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023 Oct;34(10):833–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.07.011

2. Ledermann JA, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F, Concin N, Davidson B, Fotopoulou C, et al. ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease. Ann Oncol. 2024 Mar;35(3):248–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015

3. Colombo N, Sessa C, du Bois A, Ledermann J, McCluggage WG, McNeish I, et al; ESMO-ESGO Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference Working Group. ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathologyand molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease†. Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):672–705. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz062

4. Vergote I, Tropé CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, et al.; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group; NCIC Clinical Trials Group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 2;363(10):943–953. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0908806

5. Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, Jayson GC, Kitchener H, Lopes T, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015 Jul 18;386(9990):249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62223-6

6. Chang SJ, Hodeib M, Chang J, Bristow RE. Survival impact of complete cytoreduction to no gross residual disease for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.040

7. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;82:359–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1247-5_23

8. Markman M. Intraperitoneal antineoplastic drug delivery: rationale and results. Lancet Oncol. 2003 May;4(5):277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01074-x

9. Ceelen WP, Flessner MF. Intraperitoneal therapy for peritoneal tumors: biophysics and clinical evidence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb;7(2):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.217

10. Bristow RE, Chi DS. Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec;103(3):1070–1076.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.06.025

11. de Bree E, Michelakis D, Stamatiou D, Romanos J, Zoras O. Pharmacological principles of intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy. Pleura Peritoneum. 2017 Jun 1;2(2):47–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2017-0010

12. Solaß W, Hetzel A, Nadiradze G, Sagynaliev E, Reymond MA. Description of a novel approach for intraperitoneal drug delivery and the related device. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1849–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2148-0

13. Solass W, Giger-Pabst U, Zieren J, Reymond MA. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): occupational health and safety aspects. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3504–3511. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3039-x

14. van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sikorska K, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Schreuder HWR, et al. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):230–240. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1708618

15. Каприн А. Д., Хомяков В. М., Рябов А. Б., Болотина Л. В., Иванов А. В., Уткина А. Б., и др. Внутрибрюшная аэрозольная химиотерапия под давлением (ВАХД) – инновационный метод лечения больных с перитонеальным канцероматозом. Research'n Practical Medicine Journal. 2016;3(2):22–30. https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2016-3-2-3

16. Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S, et al.; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 5;354(1):34–43. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa052985

17. Khomyakov VM, Ryabov AB, Bolotina LV, Sobolev DD, Utkina AB, Kuznetsova OS. Treatment of patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis: current views and perspectives. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2017;6(6):4-13. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog2017664-13


Review

For citations:


Dzasokhov A.S., Stolbova E.Yu., Turiev A.V., Astashov V.L., Gunyakov S.O., Makeeva M.G., Ischenko K.B. Multivisceral resection for ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis following induction bidirectional chemotherapy using pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2026;7(2):86-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37748/2686-9039-2026-7-2-7. EDN: YWLTZE

Views: 289

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2686-9039 (Online)