Molecular genetic classification of colorectal cancer subtypes: current state of the problem

Today, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and therefore an urgent problem of oncology. Despite all modern diagnostic capabilities, the rates of advanced cases are growing steadily. CRC was proven to be a result of a phased dysplastic change in the colon mucosa, molecular genetic changes that determine the molecular biology of the tumor, its properties, morphology, disease prognosis and response to therapy. The following mechanisms of CRC tumor progression are distinguished: chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, "methylator" phenotype, and serrated pathway of adenocarcinoma development. Application of molecular and diagnostic methods has become a promising direction in recent years. This led to the development of a molecular genetic classifi cation with 4 CRC subtypes differing not only in their molecular genetic characteristics, but also in clinical course and response to therapy.

1. The editional board of the cancer statistics in Japan. Cancer statistics in Japan. 2015. 129 p. Available at: https:// ganjoho.jp/data/reg_stat/statistics/brochure/2015/cancer_ statistics_2015.pdf. Accessed: 15.01.2021.

2. Al-Hajeili M, Shields AF, Hwang JJ, Wadlow RC, Marshall JL. Molecular Testing to Optimize and Personalize Decision Making in the Management of Colorectal Cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017 Apr 15;31(4):301–312.

3. Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, et al. Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Mol Diagn. 2017 Mar;19(2):187–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.11.001

4. Muller MF, Ibrahim AEK, Arends MJ. Molecular pathological classification of colorectal cancer. Virchows Arch. 2016 Aug;469(2):125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-1956-3

5. Bosman F, Yan P. Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer. Pol J Pathol. 2014 Dec;65(4):257–266. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjp.2014.48094

6. Setaffy L, Langner C. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: clinicopathological signifi cance. Pol J Pathol. 2015 Sep;66(3):203–218. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjp.2015.54953

7. Nazemalhosseini Mojarad E, Kuppen PJ, Aghdaei HA, Zali MR. The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2013;6(3):120–128.

8. Rhee Y-Y, Kim K-J, Kang GH. CpG Island Methylator Phenotype-High Colorectal Cancers and Their Prognostic Implications and Relationships with the Serrated Neoplasia Pathway. Gut Liver. 2017 Jan 15;11(1):38–46. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl15535

9. Ageykina NV, Duvansky VA, Knyazev MV, Malkov PG, Danilova NV, Harlova OA. The alternative way of colorectal cancer developing. the histogenetic and molecular features of serrated lesions. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2014:(7(107)):4–12. (In Russian).

10. Mozerov SA, Komin YuA, Novikov NYu, Yuzhakov VV, Pashkin SB, Mozerova ES. Tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer. Journal of scientifi c articles health and education in the XXI century. 2018:20(4):99–108. http://doi.org/10.26787/nydha-2226-7425-2018-20-4-99-108

11. Muller MF, Ibrahim AEK, Arends MJ. Molecular pathological classifi cation of colorectal cancer. Virchows Arch. 2016 Aug;469(2):125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-1956-3

12. Budinska E, Popovici V, Tejpar S, D’Ario G, Lapique N, Sikora KO, et al. Gene expression patterns unveil a new level of molecular heterogeneity in colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 2013 Sep;231(1):63–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4212

13. Guinney J, Dienstmann R, Wang X, de Reyniès A, Schlicker A, Soneson C, et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015 Nov;21(11):1350–1356. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3967

14. Thanki K, Nicholls ME, Gajjar A, Senagore AJ, Qiu S, Szabo C, et al. Consensus Molecular Subtypes of Colorectal Cancer and their Clinical Implications. Int Biol Biomed J. 2017;3(3):105–111.

15. Dienstmann R, Vermeulen L, Guinney J, Kopetz S, Tejpar S, Tabernero J. Consensus molecular subtypes and the evolution of precision medicine in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Feb;17(2):79–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.126

16. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013

17. Zhao Y, Butler EB, Tan M. Targeting cellular metabolism to improve cancer therapeutics. Cell Death Dis. 2013 Mar 7;4:e532. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2013.60

18. Sadanandam A, Lyssiotis CA, Homicsko K, Collisson EA, Gibb WJ, Wullschleger S, et al. A colorectal cancer classifi cation system that associates cellular phenotype and responses to therapy. Nat Med. 2013 May;19(5):619–625. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3175

19. Okita A, Takahashi S, Ouchi K, Inoue M, Watanabe M, Endo M, et al. Consensus molecular subtypes classifi cation of colorectal cancer as a predictive factor for chemotherapeutic effi cacy against metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2018 Apr 10;9(27):18698–18711. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24617

20. Fontana E, Nyamundanda G, Cunningham D, Ragulan C, Sclafani F, Eason K, et al. Molecular subtype assay to reveal anti-EGFR response sub-clones in colorectal cancer (CRC). JCO. 2018 Feb 1;36(4_suppl):658–658. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.4_suppl.658

21. Tejpar S, Stintzing S, Ciardiello F, Tabernero J, Van CutsemE, Beier F, et al. Prognostic and Predictive Relevance of Primary Tumor Location in Patients with RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Retrospective Analyses of the CRYSTAL 56 and FIRE-3 Trials. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;3(2):194–201. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3797

22. Venook AP, Ou F-S, Lenz H-J, Kabbarah O, Qu X, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Primary (1°) tumor location as an independent prognostic marker from molecular features for overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Analysis of CALGB / SWOG 80405 (Alliance). JCO. 2017 May 20;35(15_suppl):3503–3503. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.3503

23. Sagawa T, Hamaguchi K, Sakurada A, Tamura F, Hayashi T, Fujikawa K, et al. Primary tumor location as a prognostic and predictive factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab: A retrospective analysis. JCO. 2017 Feb 1;35(4_suppl):711–711. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.4_suppl.711

24. Stintzing S, Wirapati P, Lenz H-J, Neureiter D, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, et al. Consensus molecular subgroups (CMS) of colorectal cancer (CRC) and fi rst-line effi cacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab in the FIRE3 (AIO KRK-0306) trial. JCO. 2017 May 20;35(15_suppl):3510–3510. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.3510

25. Boland PM, Ma WW. Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2017 May 11;9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9050050