Optimization of planning radionuclide diagnostic tests in osteoscintigraphy
https://doi.org/10.37748/2686-9039-2021-2-1-1
Abstract
Purpose of the study. Determining maximum possible number of high-quality radionuclide studies by days of the generator operation.
Materials and methods. We studied the factors influencing the capacity of radionuclide diagnostic tests in osteoscintigraphy (OSG) by days of service life of a 99mTc generator GT-4K. The OSG capacity, the required resource of 99mTc and its efficiency in OSG were calculated. The optimal days for the generator delivery were determined.
The Pirfotech 99mTc radiopharmaceutical (RFP) prepared with the generator was used for OSG.
Scanning, data collection and processing of results were carried out on gamma-cameras of the systems Signature Series, Symbia T16 Siemens, and syngo M1 Applications VB10 Siemens.
Parameters of the radioactivity of 99mTc were processed by mathematical methods using the Excel program.
Results. We revealed specific factors influencing the OSG capacity: 1) three-hour accumulation of RFP after its administration to the patient; 2) generator activity by days of its operation; 3) the day of the week of the generator delivery. We calculated quantitative indicators of the maximum possible OSG capacity during the generator operation (maximum number of OSG procedures by days of operation, total capacity, preferred day of the week for the generator delivery).
Conclusion. The most significant factors in optimal OSG planning by days of the generator operation are the generator specifications, quantity and frequency of generator supply, provision of gamma-cameras.
The described technique for scheduling diagnostic procedures can be useful for the efficient use of the generator system which ensures the maximum amount of high-quality RFP from the generator eluate and contributes to the objectification of the cancer process in order to choose the treatment tactics.
About the Authors
N. A. MaksimovaRussian Federation
Natalya A. Maksimova – Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, head of the radioisotope laboratory with the ultrasound diagnostics group.
63 14 line str., Rostov-on-Don 344037, Russian Federation
V. G. Karpun
Russian Federation
Vladimir G. Karpun – engineer-physicist of the radioisotope laboratory with the ultrasound diagnostics group.
63 14 line str., Rostov-on-Don 344037, Russian Federation
M. A. Arzamastseva
Russian Federation
Marina A. Arzamastseva – Cand. Sci. (Med.), radiologist of the radioisotope laboratory with the ultrasound diagnostics group.
63 14 line str., Rostov-on-Don 344037, Russian Federation
M. G. Ilchenko
Russian Federation
Maria G. Ilchenko – Cand. Sci. (Med.), radiologist of the radioisotope laboratory with the ultrasound diagnostics group.
63 14 line str., Rostov-on-Don 344037, Russian Federation
O. S. Shlyk
Russian Federation
Olga S. Shlyk – physician-endocrinologist of the consultative and diagnostic department, post-graduate student.
63 14 line str., Rostov-on-Don 344037, Russian Federation
References
1. Standards of ultrasound, RCT, MRI, SPECT, PET/CT and AH studies in oncology. Edited by B.I.Dolgushin, I.E.Tyurin. Moscow: 2018, 116 p. (In Russian).
2. Kit OI. Neuroendocrine, clinical and morphological aspects of gastric cancer. National Medical Research Centre for Oncology of the Ministry of Health of Russia. Novocherkassk: 2014, 224 p. (In Russian).
3. Gardanova JR, Abdullin II, Chernov DN, Chernov AV, Kekteeva VI. Coping strategies in patients with prostate cancer. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2015;2(4):66–69. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-4-66-69
4. Sidorov DV, Rubtsova NA, Leontyev AV, Lozhkin MV, Petrov LO, Lazutina TN, et al. Methods of evaluation of the functional status of the liver in the planning of anatomical resections about primary and metastatic tumors: current state of the problem, their own experience and perspectives. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2015;2(1):13–20. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-1-13-20
5. Kaprin AD, Kostin AA, Kulchenko NG, Fomin DK, Popov SV, Kruglov DP, et al. Diagnostic capabilities of penile scintigraphy in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2017;(1):68–73. (In Russian).
6. Ryzhkov AD, Krylov AS, Bludov AB, Shiryaev SV. Osteoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT in the diagnosis of various variants of bone metastases. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(2):41–46. (In Russian).
7. Neledov DV, Shavladze NZ. Diagnostics of bone metastases: the possibilities of whole body magnetic resonance tomography. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2009;(S1):142-143. (In Russian).
8. Methodical guidelines 2.6.1.3151-13 "Evaluation and accounting of effective doses in patients during radionuclide diagnostic studies". (In Russian). Available at: https://meganorm.ru/Data2/1/4293766/4293766471.pdf
9. Radionuclide diagnostics. Edited by F.M.Lyassa, Moscow: Meditsina, 1983, 304 p. (In Russian).
10. Maksimova NA, Arzamastseva MA, Agarkova EI. Possibilities of using hybrid technologies of single-photon emission and X-ray computed tomography in the diagnosis of osteodestructive metastatic processes. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2019;6(S):182. (In Russian).
11. Ivanov VI, Mashkovich VP, Tsenter EM. International System of Units (SI) in Nuclear Science and Technology: A Reference Guide. Moscow: Energoizdat, 1981, 200 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Maksimova N.A., Karpun V.G., Arzamastseva M.A., Ilchenko M.G., Shlyk O.S. Optimization of planning radionuclide diagnostic tests in osteoscintigraphy. South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2021;2(1):6-13. https://doi.org/10.37748/2686-9039-2021-2-1-1